Lead Data & Enrichment
LeadMagic
LeadMagic is a pay-as-you-go enrichment API and waterfall tool that finds verified work emails and mobile numbers from LinkedIn profiles and company data.
- $41/mo
- entry paid plan (Basic), billed annuallyVendor pricing page, read Aug 12, 2026
Best for: RevOps teams and growth engineers who want low-cost, credits-based enrichment they can plug into Clay, n8n, or custom workflows.
LeadMagic provides enrichment as a service through an API and a simple UI, covering work email lookup, mobile number finding, and LinkedIn profile resolution. It is positioned in the waterfall enrichment category, a relatively new segment (prominent since 2023 to 2024) where multiple underlying data vendors are queried in sequence to maximize match rates without the buyer paying for a single expensive exclusive data license. Pricing is credits-based and designed to be cost-competitive against sourcing the same data through tools with larger feature sets bundled in.
LeadMagic fits RevOps stacks as a data sourcing node inside Clay tables, Make or n8n workflows, or any system that accepts API calls. Teams compare it directly to Datagma, Prospeo, and Hunter for email finding, and to Waterfall (the standalone product) or Clay's own waterfall logic for multi-source enrichment. Its advantage is usually cost per verified contact; its limitation is that it provides less workflow orchestration than Clay and less CRM context than Surfe.
Pricing (read Aug 12, 2026)
- Entry paid plan
- Basic: $41/mo billed annually, $49.99/mo billed monthly (includes 2,000 credits/mo)
- Free tier
- not stated
- Billed per
- credits
Vendor pricing page · Compare against all tools in the pricing index
14 articles mentioning LeadMagic
Best Cold Email Stack Under $300 in 2026
Exact cost breakdowns for two sub-$300 cold email stacks. Smartlead + Clay + Pipedrive vs Instantly + LeadMagic, priced to the dollar.
Ian Chamberland 
Lusha Competitors That Stop Credit Drain Dead
Lusha credits burning fast, leads not closing? Here are the waterfall enrichment alternatives RevOps teams are switching to in 2026.
Ian Chamberland 
HubSpot Workflows to n8n Migration Playbook
Step-by-step guide for RevOps teams moving automation off HubSpot Workflows onto n8n when costs spike and workflow limits bite. 900-1200 words.
Ian Chamberland 
SmartReach vs Smartlead: Budget Multichannel Outreach Compared
SmartReach vs Smartlead compared on deliverability, multichannel features, and price. Find out which fits your outreach stack in 2026.
Ian Chamberland 
Apollo vs LeadMagic vs Clay: Data Quality and Cost in 2026
Apollo's breadth, Clay's flexibility, LeadMagic's waterfall efficiency compared on data quality and real cost-per-lead math for RevOps teams.
Ian Chamberland 
Lusha Reviews 2026: The Honest Take for Outbound Data Teams
Lusha reviewed for outbound data teams in 2026. How it stacks up against Apollo, Prospeo, and LeadMagic on data quality, pricing, and workflow fit.
Ian Chamberland 
LeadMagic Pricing in 2026: What You Actually Pay Per Enrichment
LeadMagic pricing broken down by credit type, overage, and real cost per enrichment. Plus how it stacks up against Surfe, Prospeo, and FullEnrich.
Ian Chamberland 
Migrate from Lusha to FullEnrich Without Losing Your Enrichment Workflows
Step-by-step guide to switching from Lusha to FullEnrich waterfall enrichment, covering workflow exports, Clay integration, and what breaks in transit.
Ian Chamberland 
Lusha Pricing in 2026: Credits, Seats, and When to Switch
Lusha's credit model hides real costs for growing teams. Here's what you actually pay across tiers, plus when Apollo, Cognism, or FullEnrich wins instead.
Ian Chamberland 
LeadMagic Review 2026: Is the LinkedIn Enrichment Worth It?
LeadMagic vs Surfe, FullEnrich, and BetterContact: real enrichment match rates, pricing math, and which tool fits your GTM stack in 2026.
Ian Chamberland 
Beehiiv Lead Generation GTM: The 90-Day Newsletter Playbook
How GTM teams use Beehiiv subscriber data and referral mechanics to build outbound lists that compound over 90 days, no Clay or Apollo required.
Ian Chamberland 
Cognism vs Apollo vs Lusha: Best for European Outbound
Comparing Cognism, Apollo, and Lusha for European B2B outbound teams. GDPR compliance, data coverage, and pricing compared for GTM operators.
Ian Chamberland 
LeadMagic vs Surfe vs Findymail: Best LinkedIn Enrichment Tool
LeadMagic, Surfe, and Findymail compared for outbound teams. Real data on accuracy, pricing, and workflow fit to replace manual prospecting.
Ian Chamberland 
FullEnrich vs BetterContact vs Surfe: Waterfall Enrichment Compared
FullEnrich, BetterContact, Surfe, and LeadMagic compared on waterfall enrichment depth, hit rates, and price. Find the right tool for your GTM stack.
Ian Chamberland Frequently asked questions
What is LeadMagic and how does it work?
LeadMagic is a credits-based enrichment service that takes LinkedIn URLs or company domain inputs and returns verified work emails and mobile numbers by querying multiple underlying data sources.
How does LeadMagic compare to Clay for enrichment?
Clay is a full workflow and enrichment orchestration platform with a spreadsheet interface, while LeadMagic is a focused enrichment API best used as a data node inside Clay or another automation tool.
Who should not use LeadMagic?
Teams that want a self-contained prospecting platform with sequencing, CRM sync, and enrichment in one place will find LeadMagic too narrow; it is built for technical buyers comfortable using APIs or no-code automation builders.